Our Trojan Horse President….


Obama bows to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia

Trojan Horse (definition):
concealed stratagem: somebody or something that is meant to disrupt, undermine, subvert, or destroy an enemy or rival, especially somebody or something that operates while concealed within an organization.

They say truth is stranger than fiction.

And as Robert Knight at the Washington Times points out, writing a novel about a President whose goal is to undermine the USA could never match the real thing we have in Barack Hussein Obama.

As we begin 2012, it is imperative that we remember the damage that this President has unleashed upon our country.  He must be removed from office….and this is the year we must do it.

Knights article is a great reminder of so many of the appalling things Obama has done in three years….for which much of the media and many Americans have given him a pass…

I was thinking about writing a novel about what might happen if a man who hates America and wants to bring it down is somehow elected president. What would he do?……

…….First, the Trojan Horse president would initiate unprecedented spending, driving the debt up by more than $4 trillion just in the first three years. Much of the money would go into the pockets of political supporters and people who donate heavily to his campaigns…….

……….(He would)  Ship hundreds of taxpayer-purchased firearms to Mexican drug gangs in order to frame law-abiding gun sellers in Texas. When the Fast and Furious weapons are used to kill U.S. and Mexican lawmen, the attorney general will pretend he didn’t know about the program until very recently and is shocked, shocked! The attorney general will claim that critics of this criminally insane policy are motivated by racial animus against him and the president. After all, this worked when anyone questioned why the president’s college and medical records were sealed or why he attended a Marxist minister’s church for 20 years and hung out with known terrorists.

He would appoint Supreme Court justices who believe in a “living Constitution,” which means they can ignore its plain meaning when it interferes with their ideological agenda.

He would stack the National Labor Relations Board with union hacks who would do unspeakable things such as order a major company (Boeing) not to open a new factory in a right-to-work state (South Carolina) in the middle of the worst recession since the Great Depression. If he got away with that, he would go ahead and strengthen a crony socialist system reminiscent of Mussolini’s Italy or Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela that subsidizes “winners” such as Solyndra.

Finally, throughout his tenure, he would employ the Marxist rhetoric of class warfare, blame “the wealthy” and make more Americans dependent on government checks. He would sucker Republican leaders into secret meetings and emerge to accuse them of wanting to raise taxes on all but the rich.

Read it all  here.

Democrats and Voter Fraud


Just in the last two days, many news and blog sources are reporting voter irregularities, fraudulent voter registrations, and issues with absentee ballots.

In all cases I’ve seen, the effects of the fraud/irregularities favor the Democrats or the acts are being perpetrated by Democrats.

I said this to some family members just last night —

Voter fraud seems to be incrementally more rampant with each election.  In addition, we have the courts and Eric Holder’s DOJ advocating in the direction of voter fraud.

To me, this is almost more serious than Obama’s failed stimulus, the Democratic-led force-feeding of Socialism in America, the disastrous Obamacare and more.

Why?  We have always known that our votes are the way to change what we don’t like in our government.  The more fraud and outright government support of fraudulent activity that we endure, the less trust we have in our voting process.  If Americans lose trust in their ability to vote and have it counted fairly, we lose the last vestiges of trust left in our system.  Our votes will mean about as much as they do in a Venezuelan vote or one in any third world country where the corrupt manipulate the votes in order to keep/gain power.

I mean we already seem to be on the fine line of that corruption overtaking our voting system, even with this upcoming election.   Examples:

Michelle Malkin has exhaustively documented many cases of potential fraud (not listed on this post)  that have already occurred here and here.  I encourage you to read about it and be armed with information when you go vote.

Where is the NY Times?  Where is the outcry from the Leftists on voter fraud?  Where is the DOJ?

The NY Times is more worried about poll watchers than illegals/ineligibles/dead people getting to vote.  

The Leftists are silent.

The DOJ chooses to ignore the law and, therefore, advocate the disenfranchisement of military voters.

How can you help defeat cheating at the polls? 

Take pictures of any irregularities.  Use your camera phone.   Point it out to poll officials.  Use the new American Majority voter fraud reporting app.

As Michelle Malkin points out, be ever vigilant:

Vigilance plus citizen media plus the willingness to be sued for blowing the whistle equals the best defense for voter fraud. We must all be voter fraud watchers now.

Go Vote and make it count!  We need all votes in order to overcome the “margin of fraud” by Democrats!

All signs point to a Scott Brown win in MA; any other result will smell of election fraud


Just as Scott Brown’s surge against Coakley is admittedly stunning and an invigorating  turnaround, an election win by Coakley today would be equally stunning.

Since  a Republican has not held a Senate seat in Massachusetts since 1972 and Massachusetts is an overwhelming Democratic stronghold, it was not expected even just a few weeks ago that Scott Brown could make this race competitive, much less win it.

However, many facts and anecdotal evidence now suggest that it is a race HIGHLY favoring a Scott Brown win today in the Massachusetts Senate race.

Of course the turnaround is largely due to Americans (regardless of party) becoming extremely disenchanted and angered with the Obama administration and Democratic-led Congress shoving a complete Socialist remake of America down our throats.  America has awakened and the turnaround of this Coakley/Brown race is the result of that anger.

So, just as in a status quo year, we would see a Democrat win as inevitable—today it seems that a Brown win is inevitable….The facts and anecdotal evidence all point strongly in that direction:

From Gateway Pundit on today’s electioneering by the Coakley campaign:

A Democratic operative familiar the DSCC’s massive get-out-the-vote operation says that outreach workers in and around Boston have been stunned by the number of Democrats and Obama supporters who are waving them off, saying they’ll vote for Scott Brown.

For absentee ballots:

Scott Brown is leading in the absentee voting 58-42. 9% of registered voters said they have already cast a ballot.

Democrat Strategist on Coakley’s falling poll numbers in the last two days:

“I have heard that in the last two days the bottom has fallen out of her poll numbers,” says one well-connected Democratic strategist. In her own polling, Coakley is said to be around five points behind Republican Scott Brown. “If she’s not six or eight ahead going into the election, all the intensity is on the other side in terms of turnout,” the Democrat says. “So right now, she is destined to lose.”

And on the latest polls, all serious polls taken since January 12 show Brown ahead by 3 to 15 points.

So mark my words….anything other than a Brown win today distinctly smells of ACORN/SEIU/DEMOCRAT/OBAMA voter fraud tactics.

And, come to think of it, a Brown win today will cause even more mental meltdowns for our Obama-rubber-stamped media freaks…you know the likes of Chris Matthews, Ed Schultz, and Keith Olbermann…some meds may be in order here.

This is YOUR Democratic Party….


There are so many outrageous, arrogant, dangerous and ignorant statements and topics to cover with the liberals and Democrats…and we are only 7 days into the new year, 2 days into the 111th Congress…and the Obamessiah does not ascend to throne for almost 2 more weeks…..I mean what is a blogger to do?

Thought I would summarize some recent topics and ideas of the party of  “change”, “hope”, delusions of royalty, corruption, and unethical ethics….we call them Democrats….????

  • The Bleeping (%^*^&)  Blagojevich Burger….flush with “bologna”, “cheese” and a negotiable price tag.  Actually this little tidbit is great humor but also very indicative of the quality of people we call elected Democrat officials in this “once great, hope it stays that way after four years of these people” country!
  • Perverted Porn Sex-Sellers want a bailout – Larry Flynt, big Obama supporter, wants a bailout for his porn business (H/T: Ace of Spades):

“People are too depressed to be sexually active,” Flynt said in the press release. “This is very unhealthy as a nation. Americans can do without cars and such but they cannot do without sex.”

Francis said he and Flynt would also be willing to discuss the possibility of the government buying equity stakes in their companies, as was done with financial firms.

Word has it that Bill Clinton will be appointed “Porn Czar” to oversee the distribution of these funds to be sure every dime is used wisely and that sex will be distributed evenly.

  •  Now that Obama is in office, a Democrat from New York proposed a bill for “an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.” 

Next we are likely to see a bill abolishing elections—you know, why risk it when you have the Messiah in office! (H/T: PoliPundit)

“Norm Coleman will never ever serve [again] in the Senate,” Reid told Politico’s Manu Raju. “He lost the election. He can stall things, but he’ll never serve in the Senate.”

No, Harry, actually Norm Coleman WON the election. Franken and the no-conscience Democrats are getting close to stealing it away as they’ve done other places. From FoxNews.com:

FUND: In Washington State, four years ago, the Democratic Party got the names and addresses and phone numbers of the people whose absentee ballots had been rejected. They went door to door and asked them, who did you want to vote for?

GIGOT: Who did you want to vote for?

FUND: Exactly.

GIGOT: You might not have voted before, but now you can vote.

FUND: Exactly. Right. And if they said they voted for the Democrat, they said here’s an affidavit, fill it out and we’ll submit it to get your vote counted. And if they voted for the Republican, they said, have a nice day.

I am hoping for some change soon…but not holding my breath!

The Manifesto of the Silenced Majority


At Doug Ross at DirectorBlue:

• We believe that Barack Obama is a brilliant orator and a man possessed of more charisma than any politician since JFK.

• But we also believe that his philosophy of “spreading the wealth around” is an ill-disguised form of socialism that undermines everything America holds dear.

• We believe that a “tax cut on 95% of working Americans” when only 63% of Americans pay taxes is nonsensical.

• We believe that the Obama campaign’s obfuscated funding for ACORN (originally described as “event planning”) undermines the integrity of our elections and calls into question the legality of his tactics.

• We believe that Barack Obama’s plan to form a “civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as our military is ill-considered at best.

• We believe that the Obama campaign’s efforts to intimidate WGN (on two separate occasions) when it interviewed his political foes endangers free speech.

• We believe that Obama’s choice of Joe Biden as VP runs counter to his twin aspirations of “hope” and “change”.

• We believe that a man who could not otherwise receive a security clearance should not serve as Commander-in-Chief.

• We believe that Obama’s 20-year relationship with his pastor, who he once described as his “spiritual adviser”, displays a basic affinity for a racist ideology that runs counter to everything his candidacy should stand for.

• We believe that most of Obama’s senate experience has been spent running for office; from the time he was sworn in as a U.S. senator to the time he formed a presidential exploratory committee, he logged only 143 days in the senate.

• We believe that Obama does voters a disservice by hiding his chairmanship of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (a $165 million dollar effort to improve Chicago’s schools) when he used that service as his central experience in 2000 during his first run for Congress.

• We believe that Obama made a series of very poor choices by serving on boards and sharing an office with Bill Ayers (for three years); Ayers’ organization killed three police officers, bombed numerous government facilities and nearly detonated a nail bomb at a Fort Dix Officer’s Dance.

• We believe that, no matter Obama’s relationship with Bill Ayers, his evasive and ever-morphing answers about their work together smack of a coverup.

• We believe that anyone — no matter their position on abortion — who supports killing an infant that survived a botched abortion is on the wrong side of any moral code.

• We believe that Obama’s advisers and contributors — from Tony Rezko to Valerie Jarrett to Allison Davis — cost taxpayers millions in development fees for failed (and often uninhabitable) apartment complexes.

• We believe that Obama’s Illinois state senate experience was insubstantial: it was, by his own description, a “part-time position” and he maintained two offices (one at the state senate and one at his law firm).

• We believe that Obama’s state senatorial experience was further diluted by his 129 “present” votes, which, as NPR observes , “There’s a saying in Springfield that there’s a reason why the present button is yellow… [but] I don’t think that Barack Obama was necessarily a coward for voting present on those bills…”

• We also believe that Obama’s experience as a community organizer and as a trainer for ACORN are not qualifications for the presidency.

• We believe that the candidate has not been forthcoming with his background and the key influencing forces during his formative years.

We therefore believe that Barack Obama is ill-prepared and ill-suited for the Presidency.

Barney Frank, Obama and Dems: Tax, Spend, and “Spread the Wealth


Barney Frank, just yesterday, said that we shouldn’t be concerned with the deficit “fear” right now….he indicated plans to spend, spend, spend our way out of the financial crisis (that he helped create)….and that if we can’t raise taxes now, we will do it later and we will squeeze it out of the wealthy.

I have paraphrased his words, but if you don’t believe listen here:

From HotAir.com, here is the transcript, if you’d like to read it:

I think at this point, there needs to be an immediate increase in spending, and I think this is a time when deficit fear has to take a second, uh, a second seat. I do think this is the time for a very important kind of dose of [unintelligible]. Yes, I think later on, there should be tax increases. Speaking personally, I think there are a lot of rich people out there who we can tax at a point down the road to recover some of this money.

It just galls me to hear him say that NOW the deficit doesn’t matter because we need to spend our way out of the problem primarily caused by Barney and his Democrat friends (including Obama and ACORN).

However, just about every Democrat who has had the chance, including Obama, said we should end the Iraq War (winners or not) because we are spending too much money in Iraq.   I think each of these Democrats (and some Republicans, too) need to go read what the founders intended the government’s role to be.  The governments role is to provide for a military to defend…..but the government was not formed to take from one person and give to another nor was it formed to privatize banks and slide us into a Socialist nation……Democrats would rather insert Social Engineering (ie Home mortgages for every one who can’t afford one) into the housing and lending markets, cause a huge financial crisis, blame Republicans for their own messes, and then tax and spend us all into oblivion!  But, in their eyes, if we need to do what is right and Constitutional in taking the fight to our enemies and protecting our homeland…..we are just spending too much and that is when we should worry about the deficit!  GEEZ!

Barney, Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, Obama and those like them need to GO!

On top of Barney Frank’s plans, Obama’s plans, as we learned in his answer to Joe The Plumber, is to increase taxes and “spread the wealth”.  Not to mention that when Obama lets Bush’s tax cuts expire, EVERYONE will have higher taxes.  Obama’s plan will most definitely suppress job creation and demotivate small businesses.

Obama also plans to let ACORN assist in “setting the agenda” for the nation.  You remember ACORN don’t you?  They are the taxpayer-funded left wing (claims to be bipartisan) group at the heart and center of the subprime mortgage failure and financial crisis.  R-E_C_K_L_E_S_S!  (ACORN is also Voter Fraud Central….They are actively working to kill any confidence Americans have in their right to vote by cheating with and for their leader, Obama)

God forbid that the reckless, Socialist Democrats share power with Obama….America can’t afford it financially, morally, or otherwise!  Pray for this election….!

It Ain’t Pretty: What you would get with President Obama and liberal supermajority in Congress


From the WSJ….great points about exactly what you are voting in if Obama is elected and the House and Senate have majorities, possibly even a filibuster-proof Senate.

I am still hopeful that McCain can hammer home the Socialist Tax Ideology and plans of Obama and pull out a win.  Obama has plans for welfare (that is what his tax plan consists of) that is unmatched in history.  He is also a radical Marxist / Socialist who grew up in and has embraced that ideology.  If voters can’t see that by now, then they are either not listening or don’t care.

The other less hopeful (small) part of me says that with ACORN, Obama and  SCOTUS endorsed voter fraud, there is small chance of McCain pulling it out in the battleground states.  Not to mention, the intimidation tactics of Obama and his summoning of the Secret Service against those who disagree with his policies.  

Also factor in the Main Stream Media who are so in the tank for Obama they are like part of the campaign.  Latest example is the privacy encroachment and “full vetting” of “Joe The Plumber” all because he happened to ask Obama a pointed question.  Instead of the MSM going after Obama’s answer of “Spread The Wealth”, they are going after “Joe The Plumber” with a vengeance!

WSJ Opinion in summary, from HotAir:

Read the entire WSJ editorial.  They note that in 1933 and 1965, liberal Democrats fundamentally abused the nature of government and its relationship to the economy in ways we still have not corrected.  What changes can we expect in an Obama administration?

  • Nationalized health care
  • Union supremacy and a boost of cash to the Democratic Party
  • Massive tax increases and redistributionism
  • Curtailed free-speech protections

It’s not a pretty picture.

Now I take you to the full Wall Street Journal opinion piece on the impending lurch to the far Left if Obama wins and the Congress has “super” majority status.  In its entirety, here is the piece:

A Liberal Supermajority
Get ready for ‘change’ we haven’t seen since 1965, or 1933.

If the current polls hold, Barack Obama will win the White House on November 4 and Democrats will consolidate their Congressional majorities, probably with a filibuster-proof Senate or very close to it. Without the ability to filibuster, the Senate would become like the House, able to pass whatever the majority wants.

Though we doubt most Americans realize it, this would be one of the most profound political and ideological shifts in U.S. history. Liberals would dominate the entire government in a way they haven’t since 1965, or 1933. In other words, the election would mark the restoration of the activist government that fell out of public favor in the 1970s. If the U.S. really is entering a period of unchecked left-wing ascendancy, Americans at least ought to understand what they will be getting, especially with the media cheering it all on.

The nearby table shows the major bills that passed the House this year or last before being stopped by the Senate minority. Keep in mind that the most important power of the filibuster is to shape legislation, not merely to block it. The threat of 41 committed Senators can cause the House to modify its desires even before legislation comes to a vote. Without that restraining power, all of the following have very good chances of becoming law in 2009 or 2010.

Medicare for all. When HillaryCare cratered in 1994, the Democrats concluded they had overreached, so they carved up the old agenda into smaller incremental steps, such as Schip for children. A strongly Democratic Congress is now likely to lay the final flagstones on the path to government-run health insurance from cradle to grave.

Mr. Obama wants to build a public insurance program, modeled after Medicare and open to everyone of any income. According to the Lewin Group, the gold standard of health policy analysis, the Obama plan would shift between 32 million and 52 million from private coverage to the huge new entitlement. Like Medicare or the Canadian system, this would never be repealed.

The commitments would start slow, so as not to cause immediate alarm. But as U.S. health-care spending flowed into the default government options, taxes would have to rise or services would be rationed, or both. Single payer is the inevitable next step, as Mr. Obama has already said is his ultimate ideal.

The business climate. “We have some harsh decisions to make,” Speaker Nancy Pelosi warned recently, speaking about retribution for the financial panic. Look for a replay of the Pecora hearings of the 1930s, with Henry Waxman, John Conyers and Ed Markey sponsoring ritual hangings to further their agenda to control more of the private economy. The financial industry will get an overhaul in any case, but telecom, biotech and drug makers, among many others, can expect to be investigated and face new, more onerous rules. See the “Issues and Legislation” tab on Mr. Waxman’s Web site for a not-so-brief target list.

The danger is that Democrats could cause the economic downturn to last longer than it otherwise will by enacting regulatory overkill like Sarbanes-Oxley. Something more punitive is likely as well, for instance a windfall profits tax on oil, and maybe other industries.

Union supremacy. One program certain to be given right of way is “card check.” Unions have been in decline for decades, now claiming only 7.4% of the private-sector work force, so Big Labor wants to trash the secret-ballot elections that have been in place since the 1930s. The “Employee Free Choice Act” would convert workplaces into union shops merely by gathering signatures from a majority of employees, which means organizers could strongarm those who opposed such a petition.

The bill also imposes a compulsory arbitration regime that results in an automatic two-year union “contract” after 130 days of failed negotiation. The point is to force businesses to recognize a union whether the workers support it or not. This would be the biggest pro-union shift in the balance of labor-management power since the Wagner Act of 1935.

Taxes. Taxes will rise substantially, the only question being how high. Mr. Obama would raise the top income, dividend and capital-gains rates for “the rich,” substantially increasing the cost of new investment in the U.S. More radically, he wants to lift or eliminate the cap on income subject to payroll taxes that fund Medicare and Social Security. This would convert what was meant to be a pension insurance program into an overt income redistribution program. It would also impose a probably unrepealable increase in marginal tax rates, and a permanent shift upward in the federal tax share of GDP.

The green revolution. A tax-and-regulation scheme in the name of climate change is a top left-wing priority. Cap and trade would hand Congress trillions of dollars in new spending from the auction of carbon credits, which it would use to pick winners and losers in the energy business and across the economy. Huge chunks of GDP and millions of jobs would be at the mercy of Congress and a vast new global-warming bureaucracy. Without the GOP votes to help stage a filibuster, Senators from carbon-intensive states would have less ability to temper coastal liberals who answer to the green elites.

– Free speech and voting rights. A liberal supermajority would move quickly to impose procedural advantages that could cement Democratic rule for years to come. One early effort would be national, election-day voter registration. This is a long-time goal of Acorn and others on the “community organizer” left and would make it far easier to stack the voter rolls. The District of Columbia would also get votes in Congress — Democratic, naturally.

Felons may also get the right to vote nationwide, while the Fairness Doctrine is likely to be reimposed either by Congress or the Obama FCC. A major goal of the supermajority left would be to shut down talk radio and other voices of political opposition.

Special-interest potpourri. Look for the watering down of No Child Left Behind testing standards, as a favor to the National Education Association. The tort bar’s ship would also come in, including limits on arbitration to settle disputes and watering down the 1995 law limiting strike suits. New causes of legal action would be sprinkled throughout most legislation. The anti-antiterror lobby would be rewarded with the end of Guantanamo and military commissions, which probably means trying terrorists in civilian courts. Google and MoveOn.org would get “net neutrality” rules, subjecting the Internet to intrusive regulation for the first time.

It’s always possible that events — such as a recession — would temper some of these ambitions. Republicans also feared the worst in 1993 when Democrats ran the entire government, but it didn’t turn out that way. On the other hand, Bob Dole then had 43 GOP Senators to support a filibuster, and the entire Democratic Party has since moved sharply to the left. Mr. Obama’s agenda is far more liberal than Bill Clinton’s was in 1992, and the Southern Democrats who killed Al Gore’s BTU tax and modified liberal ambitions are long gone.

In both 1933 and 1965, liberal majorities imposed vast expansions of government that have never been repealed, and the current financial panic may give today’s left another pretext to return to those heydays of welfare-state liberalism. Americans voting for “change” should know they may get far more than they ever imagined.

Be afraid…be very afraid……only thing stopping this scary mess is a McCain/Palin victory….and hopefully some surprises in Congressional elections….get out there and vote and don’t be shy to get your friends and family out to vote for McCain, too!