Our Trojan Horse President….

Obama bows to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia

Trojan Horse (definition):
concealed stratagem: somebody or something that is meant to disrupt, undermine, subvert, or destroy an enemy or rival, especially somebody or something that operates while concealed within an organization.

They say truth is stranger than fiction.

And as Robert Knight at the Washington Times points out, writing a novel about a President whose goal is to undermine the USA could never match the real thing we have in Barack Hussein Obama.

As we begin 2012, it is imperative that we remember the damage that this President has unleashed upon our country.  He must be removed from office….and this is the year we must do it.

Knights article is a great reminder of so many of the appalling things Obama has done in three years….for which much of the media and many Americans have given him a pass…

I was thinking about writing a novel about what might happen if a man who hates America and wants to bring it down is somehow elected president. What would he do?……

…….First, the Trojan Horse president would initiate unprecedented spending, driving the debt up by more than $4 trillion just in the first three years. Much of the money would go into the pockets of political supporters and people who donate heavily to his campaigns…….

……….(He would)  Ship hundreds of taxpayer-purchased firearms to Mexican drug gangs in order to frame law-abiding gun sellers in Texas. When the Fast and Furious weapons are used to kill U.S. and Mexican lawmen, the attorney general will pretend he didn’t know about the program until very recently and is shocked, shocked! The attorney general will claim that critics of this criminally insane policy are motivated by racial animus against him and the president. After all, this worked when anyone questioned why the president’s college and medical records were sealed or why he attended a Marxist minister’s church for 20 years and hung out with known terrorists.

He would appoint Supreme Court justices who believe in a “living Constitution,” which means they can ignore its plain meaning when it interferes with their ideological agenda.

He would stack the National Labor Relations Board with union hacks who would do unspeakable things such as order a major company (Boeing) not to open a new factory in a right-to-work state (South Carolina) in the middle of the worst recession since the Great Depression. If he got away with that, he would go ahead and strengthen a crony socialist system reminiscent of Mussolini’s Italy or Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela that subsidizes “winners” such as Solyndra.

Finally, throughout his tenure, he would employ the Marxist rhetoric of class warfare, blame “the wealthy” and make more Americans dependent on government checks. He would sucker Republican leaders into secret meetings and emerge to accuse them of wanting to raise taxes on all but the rich.

Read it all  here.


Jacka$$es literally celebrate “victory” over the American people they represent

I don’t know about you, but I am more angry today than yesterday over the passage of the “destruction of American healthcare” bill on Sunday.  I hope I can vent the anger into action.  We are all going to have to act to get our country back.

Before I get to the leftist and MSM celebration of America’s downfall….I was driving in the car today and an articulate lady speaking on Rush’s program fired me up….she clearly stated what many of us feel…I was cheering her on loudly in my car — all by myself !

SHE IS NOT ALONE IN HER SENTIMENT….She stated that its time the snotty-nosed young entitlement crowd and the lazy, old irresponsible adults among us need to understand the meaning of personal responsiblity, hard work, taking care of yourself and your families.  Owning a home, having a care, a cell phone, healthcare….none of it is a right!   You have no right to healthcare.  You do have the right to support yourself and access healthcare, buy a home, pay your own bills.    It’s time to get over your sense of entitlement, greed, and envy and buck it up….America does not owe you a living, a home, a car, food, or HEALTHCARE….We’re tired of covering your spoiled, griping backsides. (ie.  the above are my paraphrased words conveying the lady’s message)

And we certainly are not happy about supporting “Christmas every day for you” with the futures of our children and grandchildren!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Soak it in Nancy...for tomorrow, hopefully, you move to unemployment

So, coming home and seeing our leaders in a pompous celebration of victory over Americans is downright nauseating.  

As Rush said today:

“The liberal media is celebrating this great victory.  What great victory?  Over who?  Us! The American people! These people on the left attack us because they hate us. Period.  There’s no love whatsoever animating liberals or liberalism.  They simply seek to eliminate all opposition.” -Rush

Today, King Obama, Queen Nancy, Prince Harry, and Jester Biden, along with their leftist groupies, cheered, hollered, and smeared this monstrosity into America’s face. 

From Gateway Pundit:

When Obama arrived they chanted, “Fired up! Ready to Go!”…..

…..The assembled leftists shouted, “Nancy! Nancy!”

Biden even slipped out an F-Bomb….yea, I know hard to believe Biden said something questionable!?!

From the American Thinker:

 “Teddy Roosevelt knew [passing universal health care] was right,” thundered President Barack Obama at a Fairfax, Virginia rally last week. Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s repeated “one-day-closer” mantra tells us that the Democrats believe they have in fact won a “100-year” clash.

But if the Democrats were waging war, who were they fighting? If  Obama and Pelosi won, who did they defeat?

There are certainly the public enemies–insurance companies, doctors who saw off limbs and rip out tonsils to get fatter reimbursements–but the real reason socialized medicine has never passed is because the public has rejected it each time it is proposed.

Perhaps Obama, Pelosi and the others have won a war, but if that’s true, it is the citizens of this country who they fought against; it is the American people who they have conquered.

On the lighter side:

Joe Biden introduced President Obama today at a get-together that was hopefully more of a mass political funeral visitation than a health care bill signing ceremony, but in any case, Biden proved he’s still in “stand-up comic” mode when he reminded Americans that further debt and loss of freedom will make everybody richer:

In his opening remarks, Vice President Joe Biden noted that the Roman poet Virgil wrote that “health is wealth” — and that the signed law would make “Americans a lot more wealthy.”

The government is going to hire thousands and thousands of extra IRS agents to enforce this blessed health care bill. I feel richer already! And since health is wealth I’m assuming that Americans can now pay their taxes in avacados and wheat germ.

After the bill signing, the US Constitution was quickly escorted from the White House via the garbage exit (Dems claimed it made a racial slur).

Just as a reminder for Biden, the poet Virgil also wrote, “His sickness increases from the remedies applied to cure it,” and “Curst greed of gold, what crimes thy tyrant power has caused.”

As Biden introduced Obama at the bill signing, an open mic caught Joe telling the president, “This is a big f-ing deal.” For a second there I thought Chuck stood up.

If you didn’t see Bart Stupak in the audience, it’s because he was out on Constitution Avenue buying the Brooklyn Bridge from a homeless guy demanding change. What you also didn’t see at the health care bill signing ceremony was the health care bill. Scott Brown refused to loan Rahm Emanuel his pickup truck so they had no way to get it there.

Now Obama is off to Iowa on Thursday to sell something he’s already forced on America, like Captain Hazelwood going to Prince William Sound post-Valdez to convince the otters that they’re gonna love being covered in goop.

Good luck with the sales pitch, Dems. See you in November.

Who’s Sorry Now? IAmSorryIVotedForObama.com

Interesting website.    iamsorryivotedforobama.com (H/T: Instapundit)

Maybe many have finally come to their senses?

It’s not like we didn’t know who Obama was BEFORE the election, though!

Now Obama says ACORN and others will “shape the agenda” of an Obama Presidency

(UDPATED 10/10/08) McCain Ad: Obama’s Ties to ACORN run long and deep

Do Any of Obama’s Friends Love America?

Praire Fire: William Ayers Weather Underground Manifesto

Obama is flat-out cheatin in campaign donations

Obama’s heartless votes for infanticide

It Ain’t Pretty: What you would get with President Obama and liberal supermajority in Congress

All About Obama, Narcissism, and the Cult of Personality

Obama: Anti-Military, Anti-Weapons, Anti-Iraq and Anti-Security

Stark Contrast: Obama’s arrogance vs. McCain’s sacrifice and humility

Obama, Alinsky, and Scapegoats

Great piece on the mind of Obama at American Thinker.  READ THE WHOLE THING….excerpts below:

‘Pick the Target, Freeze It, Personalize It  and Polarize It.’  
 – Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals. 
Scapegoating is a really effective manipulation for mobs that have long ago decided that their real enemy is…  anybody. Because that overwhelming feeling of rising rage matters much more than whoever is the victim of the moment. That overwhelming tension is intolerable and seeks an outlet.
That’s what Barack Obama taught his ACORN followers in all his Community Agitator classes in Chicago. That slogan defines mob scapegoating…..
…..In psychiatry, scapegoating is called “displacement of rage,” and it is often said to be a low-level defense, one that comes easily to people who are already emotionally troubled or impaired.  With mature adults scapegoating doesn’t work very well — not unless you can make them into insecure wrecks by destroying their incomes, for example. That’s what happened to the German middle class in the Weimar Republic. It’s what will happen in this country if the economy fails to recover. That is why it is so vital to keep the administration from its most extreme spending plans, which could harm the economy if the Democrats in Congress are foolish enough.
Scapegoating is very simple, and very malevolent. It is the defining feature of human destructiveness. All the truly irrational actions in human history involve displaced rage. Pathological societies in the world are always torn by a search for new scapegoats.
About Alinsky:
Saul Alinsky was born in 1909 of Russian Jewish parents in New York City. Why was the Alinsky family living in America in 1909 rather than Minsk or Pinsk or Omsk or Chomsk? Because they fled the Russian pogroms of 1890-1910, like thousands of other Jews.
I don’t know if Alinsky’s parents were direct victims of the peasant mobs, but chances are that his aunts or uncles or grandparents must have been…..
….Alinsky did not write his little book of Rules (for Radicals) against the Tsar of Russia, nor against mob demagogues in general; rather, he wrote it in a rage against free market wealth, against capitalist individualism, against the prosperous middle class and its most successful home, the United States of America. Alinsky became the hero for other agitators — people who used to call themselves “communist agitators.” Those were not shameful words when little Saul was growing up, they were proud words.
About the Obamas:
……It doesn’t matter where you direct the rage. Brazil’s Marxist president Lula blames “white people with blue eyes.” We are living in a time of reverse racism, having flipped Dixiecrat racism to the other side. The tragedy is that we have not transcended race, not and as long as racial demagogues can squeeze this new hatred for money and power. The Obamas are the very incarnation of reverse racism. That is why they felt the need to show contempt to the Queen of England, and to bow down to the pre-medieval King of Saudi Arabia. In the next four years, or eight, or longer, you will see them do that over and over and over again, because that is their lifelong obsession.
Barack Obama and Michelle attended J-Wright’s church for twenty years, and had their little girls baptized and raised at Trinity United. Our President was brought up by a mother who was a young college radical from Mercer Island, WA, and Kansas. His absentee father in Kenya was a proud post-colonial socialist — until, it seems, he ran into trouble with Jomo Kenyatta and had two car accidents in a row; the second one of which killed him. But Barack Obama didn’t draw the rather obvious lesson that his father may have been assassinated by a typical post-colonial tyrant. Instead, he adopted the side of the persecutor in the same way the young Saul Alinsky did. Obama grew up in his early years in Indonesia, where hundreds of thousands of ethnic Chinese had recently been massacred by — you guessed it —  raging ethnic mobs looking for scapegoats. Oddly enough those Indonesian massacres are not mentioned in Obama’s two autobiographies.
Obama’s first boyhood mentor was the CPUSA’s guy in Hawaii, a black man filled with racial rage and resentment, and little Barry was handed on from one radical friend to the next, in a long chain by way of Harvard Law to the Chicago Democrat Machine. The one big gap in his autobiography is his college years at Columbia, but knowing what we know we can fill that in pretty well. He married Michelle, herself a daughter of an African-American ward boss and friend of Jesse Jackson, who made a brilliant career out of scapegoating corporations for money, power and personal fame. Then Barack was taught politics by Emile Jones, the political godfather of Southside. 
There’s only one useful rule for predicting human beings:
People tend to do in the future what they did in the past.
So Barack Obama is now President of the United States.
What will he do?
How about ‘Pick the Target, Freeze It, Personalize It and Polarize It?’ 
There go those AIG bonus guys. Let’s tax ninety percent of their bonuses and smear them in the media. Done.
There goes Rick Wagoner. Let’s kill his career at GM. Done.
Let’s try to rouse up the mob against Rush Limbaugh. Oops! Forget it — he’s got his own megaphone. Next time just go for the ones who can’t protest.
Now he darkly threatens trying officials responsible for making policy in the Bush administration.
 Life will be so much better then, won’t it?
Or will it?

Bill Ayers out of the woodwork and declares Obama “Family Friend”

News of the last two days is splashed with a terrorist….I am not referring to Bin Laden, but Bill Ayers.  You know the radical, domestic terrorist who planned and carried out bombings on the Pentagon, Capitol, and police stations.

He is the one that Barack Obama declared as “just someone who lives in my neighborhood”.  Well, Ayers is out of the woodwork now that the election is over and he has a different version of that story to tell.  He is re-releasing his book, “Fugitive Days” which includes a NEW afterword saying that Obama is a “family friend.” He was on Good Morning America today trying claim people were exploiting the “politics of fear” as well. From FoxNews:

“This idea that we need to know more, like there’s some dark, hidden secret, some secret link — it’s just a myth. And it’s a myth thrown up by people who want to kind of exploit the politics of fear,” he said. 

Ayers, now an education professor at the University of Illinois-Chicago, said he doesn’t believe that “guilt-by-association should be any part of our politics.” 

But Ayers says in a new afterword to his memoir that he and Obama were neighbors and “family friends.” 

Ayers’ reflections appear in a new paperback release of his 2001 memoir, “Fugitive Days.”

Politics of Fear?  Good lord …this coming from the guy who used fear to subvert and tear down his own government in the name of “Peace”…what an arrogant S-O-B. 

Ayers tries to paint he and Obama as victims, but the facts are Obama’s judgment IS less than stellar to have actively chosen to work with and befriend a man like Ayers. 

Victims they are not!  There is documentation, and Ayers own statements, that points to the fact that the work they did togetherwas focused on “indoctrination through education” in an effort to force “social transformation” through “resistance” of an “oppressive” American system. 

And let’s not forget the Weather Underground and their stated plans to kill millions more if they could get that far in their radical take down of America.

Ayers is an arrogant, wealthy, criminal, radical who hates America and our next President is his good “family friend”.

And lets not forget the hypocrisy of criminal Ayers…. As a known and committed Socialist, Ayers is now riding the profitable coattails of his “family friend” Barack Obama with a new release of his memoirs and all that capitalism that goes with promoting and selling it!
I guess Capitalism is OK when it benefits Ayers….laughable.

Another blogger is just wondering how you Lefties and Uniters feel about being duped by your 52% Presidential choice.  Obama, his campaign, and his supporters have shouted for weeks that Obama was not a friend of Ayers and there is nothing to the story….From Confederate Yankee:

Dear 52,

It seems the man you entrusted with your vote lied about his relationship with domestic terrorist and attempted mass murderer Bill Ayers.

Many of you either didn’t hear about Ayers, or accepted Obama’s evolving explanations that Ayers was “just a guy in his neighborhood,” or someone that he thought had gone through some sort of terrorist rehabilitation—perhaps at the Yasser Arafat wing of the Betty Ford Clinic.

But now that Ayers has come out and admitted that their relationship is very close—”family friends” is how he put it—how does that make you feel?

I ask, becuase as Malcolm once explained, you’ve been hoodwinked. You’ve been had. You’ve been took. You’ve been led astray, led amok. You’ve been bamboozled.

You’ve been conned in to voting the family friend of a known terrorist into the White House.

How does that make you feel?

And, of course, we know that your “feelings” trump reality don’t we?  But just think about that….how many Presidents have we had, until now of course, who befriended, accepted campaign money and parties from, and chose to work closely with a guilty, unrepentant, America-hating terrorist?   Yes, history was made in this election all right…

In 2001, Obama discusses HOW best to “Spread the Wealth”

An audio clip with editorial words added.  This should give EVERYONE a clear picture of Obama’s view on Socialism and “Spreading the Wealth”.  What he said to Joe the Plumber was not misspeaking— it is what Obama has believed at least since 2001 (probably all of his adult life) and, through his tax plan, he plans to implement if elected.

The lefties, Obama, and Biden are trying to say how it is simply another example of “right wing talking points” to say Obama is a Socialist and is planning to “spread the wealth”.   Geez!

But listen closely…..Obama doesn’t discuss here whether it is right or wrong to redistribute wealth….Obama assumes redistribution of wealth is right and is discussing how best to do it in this country….courts, legislation, administrative????????

From Stop the ACLU, the partial transcript:

If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court. I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order as long as I could pay for it I’d be o.k. But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf, and that hasn’t shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was, um, because the civil rights movement became so court focused I think there was a tendancy to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that…..

……I’m not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts. You know, the institution just isn’t structured that way.

(H/T: Little Green Footballs)

America, Wake Up! The Obama Temptation

Mark Levin has a great column that basically reflects what I think about the election and Americans at this point in time.  Obama is not just another candidate with liberal ideas….he is a dangerous, arrogant, narcissist with blinders to anything but overhauling America, her traditions, ideals, morals, and financial system…..

Do Americans voting for Obama REALLY understand what they are doing?

Mark Levin on The Obama Temptation:

I’ve been thinking this for a while so I might as well air it here. I honestly never thought we’d see such a thing in our country – not yet anyway – but I sense what’s occurring in this election is a recklessness and abandonment of rationality that has preceded the voluntary surrender of liberty and security in other places. I can’t help but observe that even some conservatives are caught in the moment as their attempts at explaining their support for Barack Obama are unpersuasive and even illogical. And the pull appears to be rather strong. Ken Adelman, Doug Kmiec, and others, reach for the usual platitudes in explaining themselves but are utterly incoherent. Even non-conservatives with significant public policy and real world experiences, such as Colin Powell and Charles Fried, find Obama alluring but can’t explain themselves in an intelligent way.

There is a cult-like atmosphere around Barack Obama, which his campaign has carefully and successfully fabricated, which concerns me. The messiah complex. Fainting audience members at rallies. Special Obama flags and an Obama presidential seal. A graphic with the portrayal of the globe and Obama’s name on it, which adorns everything from Obama’s plane to his street literature. Young school children singing songs praising Obama. Teenagers wearing camouflage outfits and marching in military order chanting Obama’s name and the professions he is going to open to them. An Obama world tour, culminating in a speech in Berlin where Obama proclaims we are all citizens of the world. I dare say, this is ominous stuff.

Even the media are drawn to the allure that is Obama. Yes, the media are liberal. Even so, it is obvious that this election is different. The media are open and brazen in their attempts to influence the outcome of this election. I’ve never seen anything like it. Virtually all evidence of Obama’s past influences and radicalism — from Jeremiah Wright to William Ayers — have been raised by non-traditional news sources. The media’s role has been to ignore it as long as possible, then mention it if they must, and finally dismiss it and those who raise it in the first place. It’s as if the media use the Obama campaign’s talking points — its preposterous assertions that Obama didn’t hear Wright from the pulpit railing about black liberation, whites, Jews, etc., that Obama had no idea Ayers was a domestic terrorist despite their close political, social, and working relationship, etc. — to protect Obama from legitimate and routine scrutiny. And because journalists have also become commentators, it is hard to miss their almost uniform admiration for Obama and excitement about an Obama presidency. So in the tank are the media for Obama that for months we’ve read news stories and opinion pieces insisting that if Obama is not elected president it will be due to white racism. And, of course, while experience is crucial in assessing Sarah Palin’s qualifications for vice president, no such standard is applied to Obama’s qualifications for president. (No longer is it acceptable to minimize the work of a community organizer.) Charles Gibson and Katie Couric sought to humiliate Palin. They would never and have never tried such an approach with Obama.

But beyond the elites and the media, my greatest concern is whether this election will show a majority of the voters susceptible to the appeal of a charismatic demagogue. This may seem a harsh term to some, and no doubt will to Obama supporters, but it is a perfectly appropriate characterization. Obama’s entire campaign is built on class warfare and human envy. The “change” he peddles is not new. We’ve seen it before. It is change that diminishes individual liberty for the soft authoritarianism of socialism. It is a populist appeal that disguises government mandated wealth redistribution as tax cuts for the middle class, falsely blames capitalism for the social policies and government corruption (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) that led to the current turmoil in our financial markets, fuels contempt for commerce and trade by stigmatizing those who run successful small and large businesses, and exploits human imperfection as a justification for a massive expansion of centralized government. Obama’s appeal to the middle class is an appeal to the “the proletariat,” as an infamous philosopher once described it, about which a mythology has been created. Rather than pursue the American Dream, he insists that the American Dream has arbitrary limits, limits Obama would set for the rest of us — today it’s $250,000 for businesses and even less for individuals. If the individual dares to succeed beyond the limits set by Obama, he is punished for he’s now officially “rich.” The value of his physical and intellectual labor must be confiscated in greater amounts for the good of the proletariat (the middle class). And so it is that the middle class, the birth-child of capitalism, is both celebrated and enslaved — for its own good and the greater good. The “hope” Obama represents, therefore, is not hope at all. It is the misery of his utopianism imposed on the individual.

Unlike past Democrat presidential candidates, Obama is a hardened ideologue. He’s not interested in playing around the edges. He seeks “fundamental change,” i.e., to remake society. And if the Democrats control Congress with super-majorities led by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, he will get much of what he demands.

The question is whether enough Americans understand what’s at stake in this election and, if they do, whether they care. Is the allure of a charismatic demagogue so strong that the usually sober American people are willing to risk an Obama presidency? After all, it ensnared Adelman, Kmiec, Powell, Fried, and numerous others. And while America will certainly survive, it will do so, in many respects, as a different place.