I am watching Cheney’s speech this morning as I write. (I have already read the speech and encourage you to do the same!)
Cheney is correctly skewering the naive, anti-American, and ignorant policies of the Obama administration on the War on Terror and
advanced enhanced interrogation techniques.
It is so refreshing to finally hear a rebuttal to the appeasing, anti-American rhetoric of Obama….Have I said lately how sick I am of Obama and his anti-American stances?
I just heard a clip of Obama’s speech. With his defensive and arrogant face on today, he had the gall to say “he inherited this mess” and his administration is “forced to deal with it”. Obama is mad because his own party dissed him in not allocating funds for the Gitmo closure…so he is throwing his tantrum today in this speech and in saying he will release terrorists into the US, among other things. (Something Americans in big numbers are wholeheartedly against)
Never mind that the Obama’s “inherited” meme gets old after a while….especially when you consider that Obama ran for office….nobody forced him to do so. This isn’t just about him, but he acquired, as all Presidents do, the responsibility to protect this country and work with whatever situation he acquired….get over it.
Speaking of narcissism and egotism, my mom watched Obama’s full speech this morning (something I chose not to do) and she counted the words “I” or “my” were spoken 143 times in his speech…and she herself admitted she probably missed a few!
I just counted the words “I” and “me” in Cheney’s speech…. just over 30 times were those words used!
Some truthful and clear words from Cheney:
In my long experience in Washington, few matters have inspired so much contrived indignation and phony moralizing as the interrogation methods applied to a few captured terrorists. I might add that people who consistently distort the truth in this way are in no position to lecture anyone about “values.” Intelligence officers of the United States were not trying to rough up some terrorists simply to avenge the dead of 9/11. We know the difference in this country between justice and vengeance.
The administration seems to pride itself on searching for some kind of middle ground in policies addressing terrorism. ….Triangulation is a political strategy, not a national security strategy. When just a single clue that goes unlearned … one lead that goes unpursued … can bring on catastrophe – it’s no time for splitting differences. There is never a good time to compromise when the lives and safety of the American people are in the balance.
(Big applause for Cheney when he said this last line!)
And when you hear that there are no more, quote, “enemy combatants,” as there were back in the days of that scary war on terror, at first that sounds like progress. The only problem is that the phrase is gone, but the same assortment of killers and would-be mass murderers are still there. And finding some less judgmental or more pleasant-sounding name for terrorists doesn’t change what they are – or what they would do if we let them loose.
The administration has found that it’s easy to receive applause in Europe for closing Guantanamo. But it’s tricky to come up with an alternative that will serve the interests of justice and America’s national security. Keep in mind that these are hardened terrorists picked up overseas since 9/11. The ones that were considered low-risk were released a long time ago.
Another term out there that slipped into the discussion is the notion that American interrogation practices were a “recruitment tool” for the enemy. On this theory, by the tough questioning of killers, we have supposedly fallen short of our own values. This recruitment-tool theory has become something of a mantra lately, including from the President himself. And after a familiar fashion, it excuses the violent and blames America for the evil that others do. It’s another version of that same old refrain from the Left, “We brought it on ourselves.”
Those last two sentences just above are classic Obamism.
And to call this a program of torture is to libel the dedicated professionals who have saved American lives, and to cast terrorists and murderers as innocent victims. What’s more, to completely rule out enhanced interrogation methods in the future is unwise in the extreme. It is recklessness cloaked in righteousness, and would make the American people less safe.
If fine speech-making, appeals to reason, or pleas for compassion had the power to move them, the terrorists would long ago have abandoned the field. And when they see the American government caught up in arguments about interrogations, or whether foreign terrorists have constitutional rights, they don’t stand back in awe of our legal system and wonder whether they had misjudged us all along. Instead the terrorists see just what they were hoping for – our unity gone, our resolve shaken, our leaders distracted. In short, they see weakness and opportunity.
This just gets better:
This might explain why President Obama has reserved unto himself the right to order the use of enhanced interrogation should he deem it appropriate. What value remains to that authority is debatable, given that the enemy now knows exactly what interrogation methods to train against, and which ones not to worry about. Yet having reserved for himself the authority to order enhanced interrogation after an emergency, you would think that President Obama would be less disdainful of what his predecessor authorized after 9/11. It’s almost gone unnoticed that the president has retained the power to order the same methods in the same circumstances. When they talk about interrogations, he and his administration speak as if they have resolved some great moral dilemma in how to extract critical information from terrorists. Instead they have put the decision off, while assigning a presumption of moral superiority to any decision they make in the future.
And on the decisions made by the Bush Administration:
To put things in perspective, suppose that on the evening of 9/11, President Bush and I had promised that for as long as we held office – which was to be another 2,689 days – there would never be another terrorist attack inside this country. Talk about hubris – it would have seemed a rash and irresponsible thing to say. People would have doubted that we even understood the enormity of what had just happened. Everyone had a very bad feeling about all of this, and felt certain that the Twin Towers, the Pentagon, and Shanksville were only the beginning of the violence.
Of course, we made no such promise. Instead, we promised an all-out effort to protect this country. We said we would marshal all elements of our nation’s power to fight this war and to win it. We said we would never forget what had happened on 9/11, even if the day came when many others did forget. We spoke of a war that would “include dramatic strikes, visible on TV, and covert operations, secret even in success.” We followed through on all of this, and we stayed true to our word.
To the very end of our administration, we kept al-Qaeda terrorists busy with other problems. We focused on getting their secrets, instead of sharing ours with them. And on our watch, they never hit this country again. After the most lethal and devastating terrorist attack ever, seven and a half years without a repeat is not a record to be rebuked and scorned, much less criminalized. It is a record to be continued until the danger has passed.
AMEN a thousand times over!
And now for words you will NEVER hear out of Obama’s mouth:
For all that we’ve lost in this conflict, the United States has never lost its moral bearings. And when the moral reckoning turns to the men known as high-value terrorists, I can assure you they were neither innocent nor victims. As for those who asked them questions and got answers: they did the right thing, they made our country safer, and a lot of Americans are alive today because of them.
Like so many others who serve America, they are not the kind to insist on a thank-you. But I will always be grateful to each one of them, and proud to have served with them for a time in the same cause. They, and so many others, have given honorable service to our country through all the difficulties and all the dangers. I will always admire them and wish them well. And I am confident that this nation will never take their work, their dedication, or their achievements, for granted.
Thank you very much.
NO….THANK YOU, VP CHENEY!
Filed under: Barack HUSSEIN Obama, Conservatism, Evil, Foreign policy, George W Bush, History, Inspiration, Islam/Muslim, Liberalism, Media Bias, Military Matters, Morality/Character, Muslim Watch, Nutroots, Patriotism, Politics, Progressives Ain't, Refreshing News, The Clinton Legacy, War on Terror | Tagged: anti-American, Bush Administration, Cheney slaps down Obama, CIA, country safer, Dick Cheney, dick cheney speech, enhanced interrogation techniques, George W Bush, military, obama administration, terrorists, War on Terror, waterboarding |