Truth is: Obama is weak on killers; strong on killing babies


The Dems and their partners, the Mainstream Media, are up in arms (or soon will be) over an ad depicting Obama’s stance on justice for gang members.  The call it the “Willie Horton” Obama ad.

The video can’t be embedded here, but the link is here.

There is already a story defending Obama from Time.com and ABC.com. They call it “attacking” Obama and “ganging” up on Obama, respectively. 

The ad does a good job of relating Obama’s NO DEATH PENALTY  policy for gang members committing crimes, to the many heinous crimes in the Chicago area that happened the same year he voted against the premise of the death penalty for gang members.

In addition, the ad asks the question, “…can a man so weak in the war on gangs be trusted in the war on terror?”

For some reason, when the voting record of the Democratic candidate is questioned, those mean old Republicans are at their ‘ol dirty attacks and ganging up on the poor Messianic Obama.

Well, as the ABC story points out, Obama supposedly voted against this bill because (in Obama’s words):

 “….There’s a strong overlap between gang affiliation and young men of color…..I think it’s problematic for them to be singled out as more likely to receive the death penalty for carrying out certain acts than are others who do the same thing.”

Contrast that view with Obama’s view on so-called “hate” crimes in 2007.  Straight from Obama’s Senator website:

“Hate crimes are unacceptable. All Americans deserve to live their lives without fear of hate driven attacks. Those who commit such heinous crimes should be punished to the fullest extent of the law, no matter whether those crimes are committed on account of race, gender, gender identity, religion, disability, or sexual orientation.

So, Obama doesn’t believe that a black man who COMMITS a heinous act deserves the death penalty, but a heinous crime COMMITTED AGAINST a black person should be punished to the full extent of the law, including the death penalty!

And if all Americans should live without fear of attack, don’t you think that should include the innocent families that have to live amongst the gang violence in Chicago? 

Further constrast his view of the death penalty to his stance on abortion and infanticide:  

Obama killed  (for lack of a better word) an Illinois Senate bill to protect babies born alive during abortion.  It finally passed in Illinois in 2005 when Obama was gone from the State Senate.  A similar bill, the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, was passed in the US Congress when Obama was still in the State Senate of Illinois.

The basic premise of the bill stems from a true experience where a nurse, Jill Stanek, in a Chicago hospital witnessed babies being born alive then being thrown into the hospital utlity room to die.  Her story is here.  She attended the bill’s signing by President Bush in 2003.  Her words:

I testified in 2001 and 2002 before a committee of which Obama was a member.

Obama articulately worried that legislation protecting live aborted babies might infringe on women’s rights or abortionists’ rights. Obama’s clinical discourse, his lack of mercy, shocked me. I was naive back then. Obama voted against the measure, twice. It ultimately failed.

In 2003, as chairman of the next Senate committee to which BAIPA was sent, Obama stopped it from even getting a hearing, shelving it to die much like babies were still being shelved to die in Illinois hospitals and abortion clinics.

As Stanek notes— “the reason (Alan) Keyes said Jesus Christ wouldn’t vote for Barack Obama was because of Obama’s fanatical support of abortion to the point of condoning infanticide.

So, Obama stands firm that we must be choosey about “rights” in our justice system and in life in general —-let’s protect the rights of black gang members and supposed abortions rights of women — because, in Obama’s mind, gang members are mostly black and a woman’s right to an abortion must trump all! 

And be damned the innocents depicted in the recent ad that were murdered by gang thugs and be damned those tiniest of victims left to die in the hospital utility rooms.

I keep asking — Do you really want someone for President with such a warped sense of morality?

Advertisements

8 Responses

  1. In 2000, the then Illinois REPUBLICAN governor, George Ryan, instituted a moratorium on executions because of the large number of prisoners on death row who were exonerated. The moritorium remains in effect to this day. See:

    http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-60026669.html

    So, in voting against expanding the death penalty, Obama was consistent with prevailing Illinois policy and a policy set by a Republican governor.

  2. eleanor –
    Ryan was well known as a RINO, anyway, so your point doesn’t really hold a lot of water if you are trying to insinuate ” that Messianic Obama was just agreeing with the good ‘ol Repub governor”?!?!

    Besides, Obama, in his own words disagreed with the legislation based on race; Ryan disagreed based on the problems with people wrongfully sitting on death row…..BIG difference.

    Governor Ryan was also known to have said, “”There is no margin of error when it comes to putting a person to death.”

    It is quite apparent that Obama doesn’t agree with the RINO governor on that point when it comes to abortion (or infanticide) now does he?

  3. […] the white person’s fault that black crime is so bad….That kind of goes along well with Obama’s view that black gang members shouldn’t get the death penalty….because it wouldn’t be […]

  4. […] The “O”bortion President Posted on July 8, 2008 by sharprightturn Despite Obama’s twists, turns, flips and flops on abortion…..don’t ever forget the man is squarely on the side of abortion.  His record even goes so far as to NOT defend the life of a baby who SURVIVES an abortion….Many have written about that and I have written about it here. […]

  5. […] on Death Row have an overarching right to life…..but babies in the womb…even babies born from botched abortions?…not so much.   This is so out of touch and lacking faith and humaness it makes me mad […]

  6. […] I’ve blogged this before and there are others who have information about the Illinois Bill and the Federal Bill […]

  7. […] Truth is: Obama is weak on killers; strong on killing babies The Dems and their partners, the Mainstream Media, are up in arms (or soon will be) over an ad depicting Obama’s stance on justice for gang members. The call it the “Willie Horton” Obama ad. The video can’t be embedded here, but the link is here. There is already a story defending Obama from Time.com and ABC.com. They call it “attacking” Obama and “ganging” up on Obama, respectively. The ad does a good job of relating Obama’s NO DEATH PENALTY policy for gang members committing crimes, to the many heinous crimes in the Chicago area that happened the same year he voted against the premise of the death penalty for gang members. In addition, the ad asks the question, “…can a man so weak in the war on gangs be trusted in the war on terror?” For some reason, when the voting record of the Democratic candidate is questioned, those mean old Republicans are at their ‘ol dirty attacks and ganging up on the poor Messianic Obama. Well, as the ABC story points out, Obama supposedly voted against this bill because (in Obama’s words): ”….There’s a strong overlap between gang affiliation and young men of color…..I think it’s problematic for them to be singled out as more likely to receive the death penalty for carrying out certain acts than are others who do the same thing.” Contrast that view with Obama’s view on so-called “hate” crimes in 2007. Straight from Obama’s Senator website: “Hate crimes are unacceptable. All Americans deserve to live their lives without fear of hate driven attacks. Those who commit such heinous crimes should be punished to the fullest extent of the law, no matter whether those crimes are committed on account of race, gender, gender identity, religion, disability, or sexual orientation. So, Obama doesn’t believe that a black man who COMMITS a heinous act deserves the death penalty, but a heinous crime COMMITTED AGAINST a black person should be punished to the full extent of the law, including the death penalty! And if all Americans should live without fear of attack, don’t you think that should include the innocent families that have to live amongst the gang violence in Chicago? Further constrast his view of the death penalty to his stance on abortion and infanticide: Obama killed (for lack of a better word) an Illinois Senate bill to protect babies born alive during abortion. It finally passed in Illinois in 2005 when Obama was gone from the State Senate. A similar bill, the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, was passed in the US Congress when Obama was still in the State Senate of Illinois. The basic premise of the bill stems from a true experience where a nurse, Jill Stanek, in a Chicago hospital witnessed babies being born alive then being thrown into the hospital utlity room to die. Her story is here. She attended the bill’s signing by President Bush in 2003. Her words: I testified in 2001 and 2002 before a committee of which Obama was a member. Obama articulately worried that legislation protecting live aborted babies might infringe on women’s rights or abortionists’ rights. Obama’s clinical discourse, his lack of mercy, shocked me. I was naive back then. Obama voted against the measure, twice. It ultimately failed. In 2003, as chairman of the next Senate committee to which BAIPA was sent, Obama stopped it from even getting a hearing, shelving it to die much like babies were still being shelved to die in Illinois hospitals and abortion clinics. As Stanek notes— “the reason (Alan) Keyes said Jesus Christ wouldn’t vote for Barack Obama was because of Obama’s fanatical support of abortion to the point of condoning infanticide. So, Obama stands firm that we must be choosey about “rights” in our justice system and in life in general —-let’s protect the rights of black gang members and supposed abortions rights of women — because, in Obama’s mind, gang members are mostly black and a woman’s right to an abortion must trump all! And be damned the innocents depicted in the recent ad that were murdered by gang thugs and be damned those tiniest of victims left to die in the hospital utility rooms. I keep asking — Do you really want someone for President with such a warped sense of morality? […]

  8. […] the real enemy is Barack Obama who, as a state senator, voted AGAINST expanding the illinois death penalty to gag-related murders.  Why, when such a penalty would punish the very people who are terrorizing America’s […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: