Bill Ayers out of the woodwork and declares Obama “Family Friend”


News of the last two days is splashed with a terrorist….I am not referring to Bin Laden, but Bill Ayers.  You know the radical, domestic terrorist who planned and carried out bombings on the Pentagon, Capitol, and police stations.

He is the one that Barack Obama declared as “just someone who lives in my neighborhood”.  Well, Ayers is out of the woodwork now that the election is over and he has a different version of that story to tell.  He is re-releasing his book, “Fugitive Days” which includes a NEW afterword saying that Obama is a “family friend.” He was on Good Morning America today trying claim people were exploiting the “politics of fear” as well. From FoxNews:

“This idea that we need to know more, like there’s some dark, hidden secret, some secret link — it’s just a myth. And it’s a myth thrown up by people who want to kind of exploit the politics of fear,” he said. 

Ayers, now an education professor at the University of Illinois-Chicago, said he doesn’t believe that “guilt-by-association should be any part of our politics.” 

But Ayers says in a new afterword to his memoir that he and Obama were neighbors and “family friends.” 

Ayers’ reflections appear in a new paperback release of his 2001 memoir, “Fugitive Days.”

Politics of Fear?  Good lord …this coming from the guy who used fear to subvert and tear down his own government in the name of “Peace”…what an arrogant S-O-B. 

Ayers tries to paint he and Obama as victims, but the facts are Obama’s judgment IS less than stellar to have actively chosen to work with and befriend a man like Ayers. 

Victims they are not!  There is documentation, and Ayers own statements, that points to the fact that the work they did togetherwas focused on “indoctrination through education” in an effort to force “social transformation” through “resistance” of an “oppressive” American system. 

And let’s not forget the Weather Underground and their stated plans to kill millions more if they could get that far in their radical take down of America.

Ayers is an arrogant, wealthy, criminal, radical who hates America and our next President is his good “family friend”.

And lets not forget the hypocrisy of criminal Ayers…. As a known and committed Socialist, Ayers is now riding the profitable coattails of his “family friend” Barack Obama with a new release of his memoirs and all that capitalism that goes with promoting and selling it!
I guess Capitalism is OK when it benefits Ayers….laughable.

Another blogger is just wondering how you Lefties and Uniters feel about being duped by your 52% Presidential choice.  Obama, his campaign, and his supporters have shouted for weeks that Obama was not a friend of Ayers and there is nothing to the story….From Confederate Yankee:

Dear 52,

It seems the man you entrusted with your vote lied about his relationship with domestic terrorist and attempted mass murderer Bill Ayers.

Many of you either didn’t hear about Ayers, or accepted Obama’s evolving explanations that Ayers was “just a guy in his neighborhood,” or someone that he thought had gone through some sort of terrorist rehabilitation—perhaps at the Yasser Arafat wing of the Betty Ford Clinic.

But now that Ayers has come out and admitted that their relationship is very close—”family friends” is how he put it—how does that make you feel?

I ask, becuase as Malcolm once explained, you’ve been hoodwinked. You’ve been had. You’ve been took. You’ve been led astray, led amok. You’ve been bamboozled.

You’ve been conned in to voting the family friend of a known terrorist into the White House.

How does that make you feel?

And, of course, we know that your “feelings” trump reality don’t we?  But just think about that….how many Presidents have we had, until now of course, who befriended, accepted campaign money and parties from, and chose to work closely with a guilty, unrepentant, America-hating terrorist?   Yes, history was made in this election all right…

Obama’s Anarchist “Pal” Bill Ayers CALLS POLICE on reporter!


This goes in the hypocrite, lefty, stupid anarchist, unrepentant terrorist, sorry excuse-for-a-human, Obama’s like-minded pal “hide from tough questions” category.

Bill Ayers calls police on Fox News Channel reporter and has police escort Ayers to his car.  This is the same Bill Ayers who tried to bomb police headquarters and who is a self-proclaimed, unrepentant terrorist himself…..laughable, ironic, and so Left-like!

(H/T: The Jawa Report)

Prairie Fire: William Ayers Weather Underground Manifesto


This follows right along with my last post about the Weather Underground’s plans to take over America and  force re-education or be exterminated.

The manifesto produced by William Ayers and his wife Bernardine Doehrn  outlines plans to seize power in a  Communist take-over of the United States.  The book is called Praire Fire: The Politics of Revolutionary Anti-Imperialism.  I recommend you read the entire summary at ZombieTime. (Actual text from book is in red)

Some excerpts:

Our job is to tap the discontent seething in many sectors of the population, to find allies everywhere people are hungry or angry, to mobilize poor and working people against imperialism.

We have an urgent responsibility: to destroy imperialism from within in order to help free the world and ourselves from its grasp.

Our final goal is the destruction of imperialism, the seizure of power, and the creation of socialism. Our strategy for this stage of the struggle is to organize the oppressed people of the imperial nation itself to join with the colonies in the attack on imperialism. This process of attacking and weakening imperialism involves the defeat of all kinds of national chauvinism and arrogance; this is a precondition to our fight for socialism.

And William Ayers definition of Socialism, with the exception of the violence so far, sounds like Democrat and Obama talking points:

Socialism is the total opposite of capitalism/imperialism. It is the rejection of empire and white supremacy. Socialism is the violent overthrow of the bourgeoisie, the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat, and the eradication of the social system based on profit. Socialism means control of the productive forces for the good of the whole community instead of the few who live on hilltops and in mansions. Socialism means priorities based on human need instead of corporate greed. Socialism creates the conditions for a decent and creative quality of life for all.

What other great things was this radical, terrorist group trying to achieve?

The unique and fundamental condition of this time is the decline of U.S. imperialism. Our society is in social and economic crisis and assumptions about the U.S. are turned on their heads. These are hard conditions to live through. But they are favorable for the people and for revolution.
These conditions of constant change demand the weapon of theory. Like people everywhere, we are analyzing how to bring to life the potential forces which can destroy U.S. imperialism.
We are a guerrilla organization. We are communist women and men, underground in the United States for more than four years. We are deeply affected by the historic events of our time in the struggle against U.S. imperialism.
Our intention is to disrupt the empire, to incapacitate it, to put pressure on the cracks, to make it hard to carry out its bloody functioning against the people of the world, to join the world struggle, to attack from the inside.
Our intention is to engage the enemy, to wear away at him, to harass him, to isolate him, to expose every weakness, to pounce, to reveal his vulnerability.
Our intention is to encourage the people, to provoke leaps in confidence and consciousness, to stir the imagination, to popularize power, to agitate, to organize, to join in every way possible the people’s day-to-day struggles.
Our intention is to forge an underground, a clandestine political organization engaged in every form of struggle, protected from the eyes and weapons of the state, a base against repression, to accumulate lessons, experience and constant practice, a base from which to attack.

So what does this have to do with Barack Obama….well it is well-documented that Barack Obama and Bill Ayers have ties that go back several years…..

There’s no getting around it: William Ayers was a violent communist revolutionary bent on overthrowing the government and “seizing power” in the United States. The proof is on this page. And the only difference between the 1970s William Ayers and the William Ayers whom Barack Obama associated with is a change in rhetorical style; a re-wording of his radical philosophy to make it seem more mainstream. But the underlying political thesis (i.e. communism) remains the same.

For the record, and just to be complete, here are some links documenting Obama’s many connections to William Ayers:

• Ayers and Obama worked together for years on a school reform program called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge.
• Ayers and Obama also served together on the board of the Woods Fund of Chicago, a separate charity organization.
• Obama had his political coming-out party in William Ayers’ home.
Ayers mentions Obama by name in a book he wrote in 1997, and mentions that the two are very close neighbors.
• Obama gave a short glowing review of that same Ayers book for the Chicago Tribune.
• Obama and Ayers were both presenters together on a panel about juvenile justice (organized by Michelle Obama).
• Both Obama and Ayers were close friends with the same person, Rashid Kalidi.

There are also several unverified rumors swirling around that have not yet been documented: That Ayers may have helped to write part of Obama’s autobiography; that Ayers babysat for Obama’s children; that Obama and Ayers shared an office space together for three years, on the same floor of the same building in Chicago; and that Ayers and Obama may have known each other as far back as 1981, when both were attending adjacent schools and living in the same immediate neighborhood in New York at the exact same time.

And Ayers has NOT changed his point of view even when working with Obama.  In April, 2002, Ayers said:

I considered myself partly an anarchist then and consider myself partly an anarchist now. I mean I’m as much an anarchist as I am a Marxist…. I’m very open about what I think and nobody here is surprised by what I think.

Is one of those regrets that I took extreme measures against the United States at a time of tremendous crisis? No it is not. I don’t regret that. The people of the world are being exploited and oppressed and militarized by the great imperialist powers, led by the United States. That is the situation today in my view.

And I’m not sorry about anything that I participated to try to end that war or against that government that was waging that war.

In 2004, Ayers said:

If we were being fair and open-minded, then if you looked around at the world today, you would say the greatest purveyor of of violence, as King said, is our own government. …

White supremacy and racism continues to be the dagger point of American democracy. I do believe that. I believed it then, I believe it now.

In 2006,

We were anti-authoritarian, anti-orthodoxy, communist street fighters.

I want to embrace…draft resisters, deserters, tax avoiders…

If we know we hope to achieve a democratic and socialist world, a culture of life and love, our strategy and tactics are informed by filling that vision out on the ground…

I went to Camp Casey in August precisely because I’m an agnostic about how and where the rebellion will break out, but I know I want to be there and I know it will break out…

Opposing aggressive war is always urgent, but for revolutionaries we need to both be fully activated in the opposition…

And finally,

All of this is, of course, just the tip of the iceberg. To this day, nearly every word that Ayers utters and every sentence that he writes hews to the exact same communist line. You can easily find hundreds more examples yourself just by browsing through his blog or simply by Googling his name and searching for his writings and speeches, almost all of which still revolve around notions promulgated in Prairie Fire.

William Ayers is a communist. By his own description. He was a communist then, he is a communist now, and he was a communist for the entire time that Barack Obama worked with him and was associated with him.

You have to suspend a lot of rational thinking to not believe that Obama is one of two things and neither of them is good: 

1) Obama is a tool of this far-left radical fringe and, while he is bought by them, he is not aware of the extent to which these types intend to do harm, OR

2) Obama, while not exposing anything this radical so far, is a member of this belief system and plans to reconstruct this country into something Bill Ayers knows, but the rest of us Americans will not.

#1 is not likely at all….#2 is the most likely scenario considering Obama has not had any serious associations, mentors, or relationships with anyone other than radicals, Socialists, Marxists, and a domestic terrorist and his wife.   Not to mention that this manifesto, Prairie Fire, references Black Liberation Ideology …..which is exactly what Jeremiah Wright preached to Obama and his family for 20 years!

(H/T: Michelle Malkin)

Ayers’ Weathermen planned “re-education”, genocide of Americans


This should give you a good chill…..especially in light of the fact that the current front-runner for President befriended the leader of the Weathermen, Bill Ayers.  William Ayers also never repented of his crimes and wished he had done more.

Read the summary from Belmont Club and then watch the 2 minute video:

Undercover agent Larry Grathwohl discusses the Weather Underground’s post-revolution governing plans for the United States on a YouTube video. The video is taken from the 1982 documentary “No Place to Hide”. The Weathermen’s plans included putting parts of United States under the administration of Cuba, North Vietnam, China and Russia and re-educating the uncooperative in camps in located in the Southwest. Since there would be holdouts, plans were made for liquidating the estimated 25 million unreconstructable die-hards.

The most interesting moment of the video comes when Grathwohl asks the viewer to imagine what it’s like to be in a room with 25 people, all of whom have master’s degrees or higher from elite institutions of higher learning like Columbia, listening to them discuss the logistics of killing 25 million Americans.

Actually, it’s easy. What’s hard to imagine is sitting in a room full of plumbers discussing the same thing. The longer I live the less I believe that humanity is able to live without submitting itself to some kind of belief system. Western Civilization decided to liberate itself from a belief in Christ — whose Kingdom was not of this world — and went straight to the altars of Nazism and Communism, whose kingdom was in the camps.  People like Ayers aren’t atheists, they’re true believers. GK Chesterton was right when he said that a man who declares he has stopped believing in God often doesn’t mean he believes in nothing. It only means he’s willing to believe in anything.

Jean Paul Sarte believed Che Guevara was “not only an intellectual but also the most complete human being of our age … [the] era’s most perfect man”, which just goes to show you can get a fancy diploma from the École Normale Supérieure and still graduate with not an iota of common sense. Unclogging a drain with a snake is something anyone with a little intelligence and persistence can do. Planning the death of millions of Americans takes an education.

What with our urban police officers and security agencies planning for riots after the election and the VERY REAL possiblility of a President who indeed has “palled” around with someone who led a group planning MASS genocide on our citizens, I am feeling like I no longer live in America…..

This is crazy and Obama must not become President of this land!

The Case Against Barack Obama


From HotAir.com, Mary Katherine Ham and Guy Benson lay out the compelling case against Barack Obama.

READ IT!

The comprehensive argument against Barack Obama

The Manifesto of the Silenced Majority


At Doug Ross at DirectorBlue:

• We believe that Barack Obama is a brilliant orator and a man possessed of more charisma than any politician since JFK.

• But we also believe that his philosophy of “spreading the wealth around” is an ill-disguised form of socialism that undermines everything America holds dear.

• We believe that a “tax cut on 95% of working Americans” when only 63% of Americans pay taxes is nonsensical.

• We believe that the Obama campaign’s obfuscated funding for ACORN (originally described as “event planning”) undermines the integrity of our elections and calls into question the legality of his tactics.

• We believe that Barack Obama’s plan to form a “civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as our military is ill-considered at best.

• We believe that the Obama campaign’s efforts to intimidate WGN (on two separate occasions) when it interviewed his political foes endangers free speech.

• We believe that Obama’s choice of Joe Biden as VP runs counter to his twin aspirations of “hope” and “change”.

• We believe that a man who could not otherwise receive a security clearance should not serve as Commander-in-Chief.

• We believe that Obama’s 20-year relationship with his pastor, who he once described as his “spiritual adviser”, displays a basic affinity for a racist ideology that runs counter to everything his candidacy should stand for.

• We believe that most of Obama’s senate experience has been spent running for office; from the time he was sworn in as a U.S. senator to the time he formed a presidential exploratory committee, he logged only 143 days in the senate.

• We believe that Obama does voters a disservice by hiding his chairmanship of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (a $165 million dollar effort to improve Chicago’s schools) when he used that service as his central experience in 2000 during his first run for Congress.

• We believe that Obama made a series of very poor choices by serving on boards and sharing an office with Bill Ayers (for three years); Ayers’ organization killed three police officers, bombed numerous government facilities and nearly detonated a nail bomb at a Fort Dix Officer’s Dance.

• We believe that, no matter Obama’s relationship with Bill Ayers, his evasive and ever-morphing answers about their work together smack of a coverup.

• We believe that anyone — no matter their position on abortion — who supports killing an infant that survived a botched abortion is on the wrong side of any moral code.

• We believe that Obama’s advisers and contributors — from Tony Rezko to Valerie Jarrett to Allison Davis — cost taxpayers millions in development fees for failed (and often uninhabitable) apartment complexes.

• We believe that Obama’s Illinois state senate experience was insubstantial: it was, by his own description, a “part-time position” and he maintained two offices (one at the state senate and one at his law firm).

• We believe that Obama’s state senatorial experience was further diluted by his 129 “present” votes, which, as NPR observes , “There’s a saying in Springfield that there’s a reason why the present button is yellow… [but] I don’t think that Barack Obama was necessarily a coward for voting present on those bills…”

• We also believe that Obama’s experience as a community organizer and as a trainer for ACORN are not qualifications for the presidency.

• We believe that the candidate has not been forthcoming with his background and the key influencing forces during his formative years.

We therefore believe that Barack Obama is ill-prepared and ill-suited for the Presidency.

Do you want to vote the same as this guy?


William Ayers was the leader who planned to bomb a dance at Fort Dix in the early 1970’s…he was never prosecuted, never repented, never said “sorry”, and wishes he’d killed more.

He launched the career of Barack Obama in his home!  We know who William Ayers and his type are voting for…..What about you?

(H/T: Confederate Yankee)

It takes the British to say what needs to be said….


It has taken a British publication to sum up the absolute screwed up notion that our country may well elect Barack Obama as President.

Summary paragraph from The Spectator, UK:

You have to pinch yourself – a Marxisant radical who all his life has been mentored by, sat at the feet of, worshipped with, befriended, endorsed the philosophy of, funded and been in turn funded, politically promoted and supported by a nexus comprising black power anti-white racists, Jew-haters, revolutionary Marxists, unrepentant former terrorists and Chicago mobsters, is on the verge of becoming President of the United States. And apparently it’s considered impolite to say so.

Read the rest here.

(H/T: The Obama File)

Do any of Obama’s friends love America?


Chicago Tribune

Source: Chicago Tribune

This cartoon sums it up.  I have often asked the questions of liberals and others who support Obama:
 “Is there anyone around Obama, any of his friends, or any of his “mentors” who are not radical, anti-American, Socialists or who are not involved with corruption?   Are there any who actually love America and believe she is the greatest force for good in the World?”
For those who have mentored Obama since childhood, for those in positions close to Obama and/or those most able to influence policy…..the answer to both questions is a clear NO.

The Stealth Candidate is a Scary Prospect for those who love America


David Limbaugh basically hits the nail on the head on why Ayers, Khalidi, Wright and others are fair game in defining Obama’s past and his associations.

If Obama won’t tell us truthfully about his past, then McCain/Palin and others have every right to bring it up.

But Limbaugh’s main point is that the MSM and Obama campaigns are mostly WRONG when they say McCain is bringing up these associations out of desperation…..actually, most conservatives and anyone else who loves America has had the daylights scared out of them at the prospect of Obama The Socialist and Radical as our President.

I couldn’t have said this better….David Limbaugh’s piece in its entirety:

Democrats assume Republicans are raising Obama’s many questionable relationships in a desperation effort to salvage the election. You might think this is splitting hairs, but I believe the reason is that these relationships scare the daylights out of us.

Conservatives were very much opposed to Bill Clinton for myriad reasons, but with decades in elective office in Arkansas, at least he wasn’t a stealth candidate. Though rumors and mysteries abounded, Clinton was hardly a blank slate who emerged out of nowhere.

Obama is different. He burst onto the political scene and has risen with such alacrity that even many of his supporters don’t have a clue what he’s about or where he would take America.

It’s no wonder the conspiracy types are whispering that he’s the Manchurian candidate. It’s not as if he’s embracing his past; it’s more as if he’s concealing it, and for good reason. People have a right to know just how radical this man is, because America’s destiny is in the balance.

I’ve always been extremely confident that no matter which party is in power, it can only do so much damage in four years because of the ingenious safeguards our Constitution contains to preserve the essential structure of government that maximizes individual liberty. But I admit I’m more concerned today.

The Constitution is only as reliable as the moral fiber of the people from which it derives its power and their commitment to good (and limited) government. That’s why John Adams famously said: “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

I’m not just worried that Obama will appoint leftist activist judges who will continue to rewrite the Constitution. It’s that he wants to socialize health care, initiate a massive transfer of wealth via the Global Poverty Act and would intervene in foreign conflicts solely for humanitarian reasons when our national interests are not at stake. He obviously regards the tax code as a license to punish wealth and equalize incomes in the name of “fairness” rather than a means to raise revenue for essential government services.

Then there’s the pervasive climate of financial fear today and what it portends for the potential usurpation of power by the next president. We’ve seen oil prices rise to panic levels. But oil concerns have been dwarfed by the global financial crisis, which has led Congress to delegate nearly carte blanche authority to the executive branch to navigate through it. The character and ideology of the person who occupies the Oval Office have never been more important.

As if all this weren’t enough to culminate in a perfect storm for the next president to transform our system fundamentally, there’s also an alarming atmosphere among many Obama supporters. They follow him in a cult-like trance, having no clue what he stands for or what policy meat he would put on his campaign bones of change and hope once in office.

Disturbingly, Obama’s candidacy is inspiring certain youths to perform paramilitary drills in his honor, public officials to threaten criminal prosecution of those who criticize him, and attorneys purporting to be working for his campaign systematically to intimidate local election officials. With this mentality, is there any doubt the Obamaites would try to shut down conservative talk radio with the “Fairness Doctrine”?

Then there’s the ubiquitously corrupt ACORN (under investigation in at least 10 states for possible voter fraud), which is terrorizing the electoral process with such a widespread assault that it truly threatens the integrity of this election.

The question is: Where does Obama fit into all of this? Was he a key lawyer for ACORN, as alleged? What about his alliances with anti-American leftist radicals?

I disagree with those who’ve said the most important issue concerning the Obama-Ayers connection is Obama’s “judgment.” The very word implies that Obama doesn’t share and never shared Ayers’ views. The crucial question is whether Obama is of like mind with such radicals.

National Review Online’s Andy McCarthy reports that when Ayers “was given the opportunity of a lifetime, a $150 million fund to be doled out as seed money for the kind of programs he thought would advance the cause, the guy brought in to run it was Barack Obama – with whom he worked closely on ‘change’ in the schools for five years.”

And how about Obama’s membership in the New Party, a radical leftist organization established in 1992 to push the United States into socialism by forcing the Democratic Party to the left, as reported by American Thinker? Is it not imperative we learn the extent of this relationship and why Obama is trying to cover it up?

Does anyone doubt that if any Republican presidential candidate had a small fraction of the questionable alliances Obama has, he already would have been hounded into withdrawing from the race?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 252 other followers